UCR Turf News |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
News from the UCR Turfgrass Program |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarterly updates of ongoing research and timely information based on research from the UCR Turfgrass Research Program published in February, May, August and November. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
An Evaluation of Grasses Under Low-Input, Reduced Maintenance
Conditions, for Potential Turfgrass Use in
Victor A. Gibeault1, Stephen T. Cockerham2,
Steven B. Ries2, and Richard Autio1
1Botany and Plant Sciences Department,
2Agricultural Operations Department,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
A
low maintenance turfgrass study was established on May 28-29, 2003, at the
The
grasses were allowed to “grow-in” during 2003. Deficit irrigation (irrigation below water needed for optimum
performance) for warm-season turfgrasses was initiated in 2004 and continued
through the end of 2006. The irrigation
level was approximately 50% of the California Irrigation Management Information
System (CIMIS) reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Fertilization was restricted to fall
applications that normally totaled 1.0 pound of N per 1000 sq. ft per
year. The plots were mowed weekly at a
three inch height until September, 2005, when the plots were split to a high
cut ( 3.0”) and low cut (1.25”).
On
December 31, 2006, the formal study concluded, but the low maintenance regimes
of the study were continued to the present time. Because of drought and high temperature
conditions in 2007/2008, additional separation of relative grass performance
was noted. Grass cover and turfgrass
quality ratings were made October, 2007, and again in June, 2008. A 1-10 rating scale was used, with 10
representing best cover or quality.
The
grasses that should be noted for higher performance results under low input
maintenance practices: Buffalograsss
(all cultivars and experimental grasses), Zoysia
tenuifolia, Saltgrasses (A 138, DT 18), Sporobolis (DT 12), Blue Grama
(Hatchita), and Bermudagrass (Princess). Other grasses gave various lower levels of performance and some of the
grasses could not survive the severe maintenance regime for the duration of the
study.
Breeding
and Genetics for Improved Turf Quality and Stress Resistance
James H. Baird1,
Adam J. Luksazewski1, Robert L. Green1, and Frank P. Wong2
1Department of Botany and Plant Sciences,
2Department of Plant Pathology and
Microbiology,
Development
of Intergeneric Hybrids of Ryegrasses with Fescues as new Stress and Pest
Resistant Turfgrasses
Cool-season
turfgrasses are important throughout the
Selection and Molecular
Identification of Traits Responsible for Winter Color Retention, Shade
Tolerance, and Stress Resistance in Warm-Season Turfgrasses
Despite
the aforementioned strides to improve stress and pest resistance among
cool-season turfgrass species, the future of turfgrass culture in southern
California and other climates where water resources are diminishing lies with
warm-season turfgrasses which are better adapted to drought and heat. However, widespread acceptance among
end-users requires that warm-season turfgrasses maintain green color throughout
the colder winter months and survive under low light conditions from
neighboring trees and frequent cloud cover. We intend to focus our efforts primarily on bermudagrass by evaluating
both commercially available and experimental germplasm under field conditions
in
|